TORONTO, May 8, 2024 – Last week, federal Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland introduced the government’s 2024 Budget Bill, which contains exciting new updates about their made-in-canada employee ownership strategy. The Canadian Employee Ownership coalition (CEOC) is thrill ed that the government has introduced a new tax incentive that will level the playing field with competing succession options and lead to the widespread adoption of employee ownership in Canada.

“This new incentive, combined with the government’s recently created Employee Ownership Trust structure, is poised to create tens of thousands of employee-owners over the next few years said Jon Shell, a member of the CEOC’s Steering Committee.

This policy initiative comes at a critically important time. Over the next decade, 76% of Canadian business owners intend to retire, and the vast majority have no succession plan in place.

The creation of an Employee Ownership Trust and accompanying tax incentive will, for the first time, provide business owners with a viable alternative to selling their businesses to intemational private equity firms or competitors.

“This is smart business” said Tiara Letoumeau, CEOC Steering committee member. “With every sale to an Employee Ownership Trust, we’re increasing the likelihood that companies stay Canadian-owned, remain resilient in the face of economic turbulence, and provide meaningful wealth for working Canadians.

Employee Ownership Trusts are proven public policy. In the U.S., where these policies have been in place since the 1970s, 14 million American workers are already sharing in $2.1 trillion of wealth. Since the U.K. introduced these policies in 2014 it has witnessed rapid adoption, with more than 1,650 companies becoming employee-owned.

“As the CEO of an employee-owned company in a small town, I have seen firsthand what a difference it makes in culture, purpose and performance.” said Chad Friesen, CEO of Friesens Corporation, and member of the CEOC Steering Committee. With these policies in place, the CEOC looks forward to working with governments across the country to support substantial growth in employee ownership.

“Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) are proven public policy. In the U.S., where these policies have been in place since the 1970s, 14 million Americans workers are already sharing $2.1 trillion of wealth.”

About Social Capital Partners

Who owns the economy matters. Social Capital Partners believes working people deserve a fighting chance to build economic security and wealth. A Canadian nonprofit organization founded in 2001, we undertake public policy research, invest in initiatives and advocate for ideas that broaden access to wealth, ownership and opportunity, and that push back against extreme economic inequality. To learn more, please connect with us on LinkedIn or Bluesky or visit socialcapitalpartners.ca.

For more information, or to arrange an interview, please contact:

Katherine Janson
Director of Communications
Social Capital Partners
647-717-8674
katherine@socialcapitalpartners.ca


Share with a friend

Related reading

Blame the denominator, not the economy

Over the last couple of years, there have been countless articles warning of Canada’s poor economic performance. The mic drop has increasingly been Canada’s poor performance relative to peer countries on “GDP per capita,” with growth rankings used to draw a variety of sweeping, negative conclusions about Canada’s economy. SCP CEO Matthew Mendelsohn and Policy Director Dan Skilleter draw on economist and SCP Fellow Dr. Gillian Petit's new research to explain why GDP per capita is a deeply flawed measurement for evaluating rich countries - and is easily influenced by a variety of factors having little to do with economic performance or economic well-being.

Non-Permanent Residents and their impact on GDP per capita | Summary

New research by economist and SCP Fellow Gillian Petit estimates what Canada’s GDP per capita would have been over the past decade if Canada had kept our temporary resident numbers stable. She also estimates the expected impact on GDP per capita in the coming years due strictly to planned reductions in Canada's intake of non-permanent residents. Among key findings: Canada’s GDP per capita is misleading and should not be used as if it were the sole indicator of economic well-being. Plus, if we had maintained our temporary resident numbers at two percent of the population in recent years, Canada’s GDP per capita would look much more like our peer countries: a little bit ahead of countries like Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia and a little bit lower than countries like Belgium, Sweden and France.

Non-Permanent Residents and their impact on GDP per capita | Report

New research by economist and SCP Fellow Gillian Petit estimates what Canada’s GDP per capita would have been over the past decade if Canada had kept our temporary resident numbers stable. She also estimates the expected impact on GDP per capita in the coming years due strictly to planned reductions in Canada's intake of non-permanent residents. Among key findings: Canada’s GDP per capita is misleading and should not be used as if it were the sole indicator of economic well-being. Plus, if we had maintained our temporary resident numbers at two percent of the population in recent years, Canada’s GDP per capita would look much more like our peer countries: a little bit ahead of countries like Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia and a little bit lower than countries like Belgium, Sweden and France.

Skip to content