Employee ownership trusts: What they mean for Canadian business owners

May 9, 2024| Blog
By Jon Shell

Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) are coming to Canada! This note is intended to give business owners and their advisors a simple (albeit not short) explanation about what they are, and why they should care. I’m not a lawyer or an accountant, so I’ll try to use language that I understand (and that may in some cases not be technically perfect). So, don’t take this as legal advice, but as someone trying to explain this in a way I think I would understand.

A quick point up-front: EOTs are intended for succession — a way to sell a majority of a business to a company’s employees. They don’t help with selling a minority stake in the company — there are other approaches for that, like stock option plans and share purchase programs. So, unless you’re looking to sell your business, the EOT likely isn’t for you.

However, if you are considering selling your business in the next few years, you should be aware of the EOT. Employee ownership has a long track record of being good for employees, companies and communities, and as a result the UK and US provide significant tax incentives for business owners who sell to the workers. Canada is now following suit, exempting the first $10M of capital gains from income tax for sales to EOTs. This exemption is only available until the end of 2026, so there’s good reason to look seriously at the option.

“Employee ownership has a long track record of being good for employees, companies and communities, and as a result, the U.K. and U.S. provide significant tax incentives for business owners who sell to their workers.”

EOT-like structures are quite popular in other countries, and tax incentives are only part of the story. I’ll get into more detail about the legacy and resiliency benefits later, but here are a few stories featuring owners who have sold to their employees through this structure in the US and UK: Taylor Guitars (US), Emsworth Yacht Harbour (UK) and Craggs Energy (UK). In the US about 250 companies a year are sold to their version of the EOT, and in the UK over 300 companies have sold to their version in each of the last two years.

If you’re looking for more technical detail, I’ve added links at the end, including to the government’s own EOT explainer. If you scroll down and say to yourself “man, this is too long” feel free to skip to the end and click on one of those other links instead.

If you’re still with me, you likely have dozens of questions, so I’ll try to anticipate some of them in a Q&A format here.

Alternative ownership Employee Ownership Canada (EOC)

Share with a friend

Related reading

VideoThe Ownership Solution

Watch the video: Why would a company sell to its employees?

Canada is facing a $2-trillion business handoff. What if employees owned more of it? In this video, our Director of Policy Dan Skilleter explains why a company would sell to its own employees, how it happens and who stands to benefits. Spoiler alert: employee-owned companies are shown to be 8-12% more productive, share more wealth with their workers, keep businesses Canadian-owned and shore up the resilience of local communities and the broader economy.

BlogThe Ownership Solution

How Canada can curb the serial acquisitions quietly reshaping our economy

In many cases, threats to the affordability of everyday goods and services are the byproduct of what competition experts call serial acquisitions—a pattern of larger firms buying up a series of smaller players to try and corner the market. As Michelle Arnold and Kiran Gill explain, a fair and competitive economy does not emerge by accident. The Competition Bureau's proposed Merger Enforcement Guidelines will play an important role in preventing bigger firms from creating unfair playing fields that hurt Canadian small businesses, workers and consumers. The next step for the bureau should be aggressive enforcement of the new guidelines.

Submission

From Guidelines to Action: Feedback on the Proposed Merger Enforcement Guidelines

The Competition Bureau's proposed Merger Enforcement Guidelines represent meaningful progress against trends towards corporate consolidation in Canada. In our formal feedback submission to the bureau, Social Capital Partners outlines that we strongly support the new guidelines. However, we believe that the operationalization of these guidelines will be the real test of their impact. Guidance documents shape expectations, but enforcement outcomes shape behaviour. Serial acquirers are sophisticated actors who model regulatory risk into their strategies. To succeed, the bureau must demonstrate visible capacity to track, analyze and challenge roll-up patterns that are driving up prices and sacrificing quality and service in key sectors.

Skip to content