Social Capital Partners releases new report on wealth inequality in Canada – concludes that official statistics significantly underestimate the problem

April 4, 2024| News release

TORONTO, Apr. 4, 2024 –Social Capital Partners (SCP) today released a new report documenting how wealth inequality in Canada is far closer to the inequality that exists in the United States than official statistics claim.

The report, entitled “Billionaire Blindspot: How official data understates the severity of Canadian wealth inequality”, critically analyzes Canada’s flagship wealth survey, the Survey of Financial Security (SFS), and outlines how its methodological shortcomings lead to significant underreporting of wealth inequality.

“Wealth concentration is getting worse in Canada, just like in the U.S. The difference is that Americans have the data they need to accurately understand, discuss, and propose solutions,” explains the report’s author and SCP’s policy director, Dan Skilleter. “StatsCan has already acknowledged the need for better data, and we hope that this report will encourage them to act on our recommendations, ensuring a more accurate understanding of wealth inequality in Canada.”

The report concludes that the top 1% in Canada own 26% of all wealth, and the top 0.1% own 12.4% of all Canadian wealth. These numbers are significantly higher than official estimates and are much closer to U.S. levels of wealth inequality than previously understood. The report concludes that the American survey, the Survey of Consumer Finance (SCF), does a much better job of measuring reality and presents a series of recommendations to improve the Canadian survey.

“Deep wealth inequality corrodes democratic societies and threatens economic resilience,” said Matthew Mendelsohn, CEO of Social Capital Partners. “The misleading portrait of wealth inequality in Canada undermines our ability to have an evidenceinformed debate about how to address growing wealth concentration. Canadians are telling ourselves a story about wealth inequality that is fundamentally wrong.”

“Wealth concentration is getting worse in Canada, just like in the U.S. The difference is that Americans have the data they need to accurately understand, discuss and propose solutions.”

Changing narratives Wealth inequality

Share with a friend

Related reading

BlogIn the mediaThe Ownership Solution

How Employee Ownership Trusts keep wealth in Canada | Canadian Business

The coming wave of business successions will shape Canada’s economy for generations. In Canadian Business, Jon Shell explains how employee ownership safeguards economic sovereignty, while boosting growth, productivity and local wealth, giving employees struggling with affordability a new source of income. As entrepreneurs and owners seek alternatives to selling abroad, the employee ownership trust (EOT) provides a practical answer. Instead of letting the EOT tax incentive expire at the end of 2026, now is the time for the government to double down on employee ownership.

BlogExplainer

A housing boom isn’t a win for wealth equality and here’s why

Canada's wealth gap appeared to narrow between 2019 and 2023 and we set out to make sense of this. SCP's Director of Policy Dan Skilleter, the lead author on our 2024 Billionaire Blindspot report, connected with sector colleagues working on wealth concentration and dug into all the best available data. What he found was that the dip was largely a mirage, driven by a pandemic housing boom that temporarily inflated the one asset ordinary Canadians hold: their home. Meanwhile, these soaring prices locked out an entire generation from building wealth altogether.

Blog

A Conservative case for Community Benefits Agreements?

When a developer builds a new bridge or transit line, a Community Benefits Agreement ensures the project will also benefit the people living nearby. In Canada, CBAs have long been seen as a progressive policy tool. But what if Conservatives embraced them too, just with different priorities? In this piece, SCP's Director of Policy Dan Skilleter explores how Conservative governments might champion their own vision for CBAs and what that means for advocates on the left. The lesson: if you want good social outcomes from big projects, stop letting perfect be the enemy of the good.

Skip to content