By Nora Loreto | Part of our Special Series: Always Canada. Never 51. | This post first appeared in Truthout

Canada entered the 2025 federal election with a Liberal minority government and it emerged from the 2025 federal election with a Liberal minority government. The outcome is shocking, given that Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre had been riding the top of the polls since the end of 2023.

Liberal leader Mark Carney now has a monumental task to lead Canadians through the turmoil of a second Donald Trump term, while also addressing various crises: affordability, housing, toxic drugs and health care, to name a few.

While these crises loomed over the election, one fundamental cause was never clearly identified: concentrated corporate power.

Polls showed that Canadians were concerned about finances, the economy and the cost of living just as, or more than, than Canada-U.S. relations.

And yet, each of the parties talked more about the need to help corporations rather than limit their reach. Now, Canada’s prime minister is a man who has been the top banker at not one, but two central banks, and the chairman of one of Canada’s largest asset management companies, Brookfield Asset Management.

“During crises, corporations have the power to just raise profits at everyone else’s expense,” explains Silas Xuereb, research and policy analyst with the nonprofit group Canadians for Tax Fairness. Xuereb points to the fact that during the first years of the pandemic, corporations raised their prices with very little pushback from the Liberal government. The result was profiteering the likes of which Canada has never seen before.

Trudeau’s Liberals didn’t try to reign in corporate profiteering, instead actually backtracking on the one measure that they had promised to implement — lowering the amount of profits that are sheltered from tax when a person or a business makes a large sale, called the capital gains inclusion rate.

As a result, corporate profits in 2022 were higher than in any other year in the history of Canada, at $685 billion — Canadians had never before witnessed profits as high. While profits dipped slightly in the following years — by 3 percent in 2023 — they still remained record-high.

In 2023, real estate and education, health and social assistance services had the largest profit margins, surpassing 25 percent, and oil and gas made the largest jump to reach nearly 20 percent from -11 percent. Real estate represents 40 percent of Canada’s GDP, higher than any other G7 nation. Real estate is big business for investors, which drives Canada’s housing affordability crisis.

Xuereb points to the fact that Canada’s tax laws allow corporations to reinvest their profits without being subject to tax. That means that what is left over is all that is taxed, and therefore, wealth is increasingly concentrated in the hands of stockholders and doesn’t go toward creating jobs. “When we cut corporate taxes, corporations end up with more profits left over to give back to their wealthy shareholders,” he says.

The flip side of these profits is record-high and growing income inequality. One analysis from 2024 calculated that where the richest 20 percent of Canadians owned 67.7 percent of total wealth in 2023, the poorest 40 percent of Canadians owned just 2.7 percent of Canada’s total wealth. In monetary terms, where the wealthiest households hold $3.3 million, on average, lower income households hold just $67,038 on average.

Skyrocketing corporate wealth barely registered as an issue to debate during the election campaign. Instead, the parties all promised various tax measures that targeted personal income taxes rather than corporate profits.

The Conservatives’ campaign focused on eliminating several tax measures, which gave the Liberals a lot of space to promise a more balanced approach to taxation. Instead, they vowed to cut taxes as well. It was Carney’s first promise, something that the Liberals said would “keep more of what they earn and build a stronger Canada in the face of President Trump’s tariffs.” The proposed income tax cut would save the average middle and upper income household $300, and cost the state $22 billion over four years.

The Liberals also promised corporations the ability to shelter even more of their profits from taxes, both by maintaining the capital gains inclusion rate and by lowering corporate income tax rates if corporations reinvest profits either in Canada or abroad.

Despite the fact that Canadians said they were worried about the affordability crisis, ultimately, they did not vote for the two parties that did make very modest promises to tax wealthy Canadians more: both left-leaning parties, the Greens and the New Democratic Party, were decimated, and the latter didn’t elect enough people to hold party status. The Liberals increased their percentage of the popular vote by 10.9 percent, and the Conservatives increased theirs by 7.6 percent.

Under Carney, Xuereb warns that Canadians should expect more of the same.

“I don’t think there will be any huge changes to corporate taxation or really the taxation system in general,” Xuereb told Truthout. “I’m sure he will implement some tax breaks around the edges for corporations, which will just allow corporations to send more money to their wealthy shareholders. A status quo policy in this area is continuing a status quo that is already benefiting the wealthy and allowing billionaires to accumulate billions of wealth on the backs of working people.”


This article originally appeared in Truthout. It is republished here under a Creative Commons license. 


Share with a friend

Related reading

How intergenerational inequality threatens trust in democracy | Policy Options

Our political leaders must be willing to make difficult tradeoffs to rebalance policies toward the young and away from older Canadians, write Jean-François Daoust, Liam O'Toole and Jacob Robbins-Kanter in Policy Options. The broader economic picture for younger Canadians offers little hope, and economic frustration is shown to run hand-in-hand with political alienation. As intergenerational inequality persists and deepens, Canada risks experiencing an even sharper decline in trust in its democratic institutions than what already exists. Building affordable housing and supporting young families are essential first steps in a much-needed generational reset that puts fairness at the centre of Canadian political life.

Smith School of Business launches new Employee Ownership Research Initiative

Smith School of Business at Queen's University is launching Canada's first-ever research initiative focused on deepening Canada’s knowledge and understanding of a powerful succession model that can enhance outcomes for owners, employees and communities: employee ownership. With funding support from Jon Shell, Chair of Social Capital Partners and a board member at Employee Ownership Canada, the Employee Ownership Research Initiative (EORI) will be housed in Smith’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation & Social Impact (CEISI). The initiative will shape a made-in-Canada approach to employee ownership and create a multi-disciplinary network of academics, researchers, practitioners and businesses to fill gaps in relevant data, expertise and business-oriented resources to support employee-ownership activities across the country.

Elbows up: Keeping Canadian companies in Canadian hands | Policy Options

Blue Jays pride notwithstanding, many of Canada's most iconic companies and brands have been quietly but steadily purchased by foreign entities in recent years. As Danny Parys writes in Policy Options, policymakers should do more to keep Canadian companies in Canadian hands by providing more support to expand financing opportunities, expanding awareness of untraditional ownership models and beefing up Canada’s net-benefit review requirements. These quiet foreign sales not only lead to major frustrations for consumers, but workers also feel the impacts because, as corporate leadership moves further away from the community, so do quality and accountability.

Skip to content