By Simon Pek, Lorin Busaan and Alex Hemingway | This post first appeared in Canadian Dimension
In his first post-election news conference, Prime Minister Mark Carney made a bold commitment to “take control of our economic destiny to create a new Canadian economy.” If that is to happen, Canadian employees deserve more than inspiration—they deserve a greater ownership stake and voice in the companies where they work.
In Budget 2023, the federal government enabled the creation of employee ownership trusts (EOTs), which can purchase and hold shares of businesses in perpetuity on behalf of employees. Unfortunately, the associated capital gains tax incentive was limited to three years and will expire in 2026. Budget 2025, expected this fall, is an opportune moment to make employee ownership permanent by extending and expanding the capital gains exemption for EOTs.
Employee ownership trusts are one model among several of broad-based employee ownership, and empirical research from around the world shows they have strong benefits for firms, employees, and the broader economy: greater resilience, improved productivity, reduced inequality, and stronger continuity in business succession. For example, a recent UK study found that companies converting to employee ownership via EOTs have, on average, enjoyed a 4.4 percent higher productivity increase over three years compared to similar firms.
Early conversions in Canada—at companies like Taproot Community Support Services, Brightspot Climate, and Grantbook—suggest strong interest among both business owners and employees in this model. Based on the highly successful UK experience, it is plausible that hundreds—if not thousands—of conversions could eventually take place here. In the UK, much of the uptake has been driven by deliberate policy decisions: generous tax relief, clear regulatory definitions, and awareness-raising among business owners.
Canada’s federal government has made a promising start with the temporary capital gains exemption—but with limits. The exemption on the first $10 million of capital gains for business sales to EOTs is important. Yet many EOT transactions take more than a year to plan and complete. If the incentive expires prematurely in 2026, many potential transitions may be abandoned or indefinitely deferred.
To avoid losing momentum, Ottawa should extend the capital gains exemption indefinitely rather than letting it lapse after only two years. A permanent exemption would give business owners certainty and allow longer planning horizons, encouraging thoughtful, sustainable conversions instead of rushed ones. Just as importantly, the exemption should be broadened to include worker cooperatives. Budget 2024 proposed such an extension to eligible worker cooperative corporations, but that legislation was never finalized. Worker co-ops are a long-standing model of employee ownership in Canada, offering employees direct control rights and a tradition of democratic governance that complements the EOT framework.
The cost to the federal government is modest. The Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer has estimated foregone tax revenues from the temporary EOT exemption at approximately $7 million per year. Compared with other tax exemptions—such as the principal residence exemption, which costs the federal and provincial governments billions annually—this is minimal. Even if extended to include worker co-ops, the revenue impact would remain limited relative to the economic and social benefits generated.
Those benefits are substantial. Firms that convert to employee ownership tend to be more resilient in economic downturns, with lower incidence of layoffs and closures. Evidence from the UK shows employee-owned businesses are far less likely—by a factor of five—to lay off their staff over a three-year span than comparable firms. Employee ownership also supports stable employment in smaller communities, strengthening Canada’s economic sovereignty by keeping ownership and decision-making local.
Workers gain too—not just through job security but through income and wealth accumulation, particularly for groups facing economic exclusion. US studies show that employee ownership reduces wealth gaps, boosts household incomes, and gives workers a direct stake in profits. The social dividends extend beyond pay: employee-owners often report higher morale, greater civic engagement (including higher voting and volunteering rates), and stronger commitments to environmental practices within their firms.
Canada is at a pivotal moment. More than $2 trillion in business assets are projected to change hands in the next decade. This demographic shift, with retiring business owners seeking succession paths, creates a rare opportunity to shift large swathes of private enterprise toward employee ownership. If Budget 2025 extends and expands the capital gains exemption, this would be a powerful lever: enabling business succession that preserves jobs, strengthens communities, and shares wealth more broadly. Such a policy would likely enjoy support across the political spectrum and from the business community, and could be a quick win for Canada’s economic sovereignty.
Simon Pek is an associate professor in the University of Victoria’s Gustavson School of Business.
Lorin Busaan is a PhD candidate at the University of Victoria’s Gustavson School of Business.
Alex Hemingway is a senior economist at BC Policy Solutions.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Mapping the economic centre-left
The large and well-funded American blogsphere has a pretty wide array of economic voices and ideological camps within the centre-left tent. So big, in fact, that there’s a sub-genre of inter-blog conflict dedicated to people named Matt. Over the years, SCP Director of Policy Dan Skilleter has found it useful to categorize these various different centre-left ideological camps in his head. The categories are not mutually exclusive, and most people probably identify with a few at once. This explainer breaks down each camp's story about what’s wrong with the economy and how they’d prioritize dealing with it.
How intergenerational inequality threatens trust in democracy | Policy Options
Our political leaders must be willing to make difficult tradeoffs to rebalance policies toward the young and away from older Canadians, write Jean-François Daoust, Liam O'Toole and Jacob Robbins-Kanter in Policy Options. The broader economic picture for younger Canadians offers little hope, and economic frustration is shown to run hand-in-hand with political alienation. As intergenerational inequality persists and deepens, Canada risks experiencing an even sharper decline in trust in its democratic institutions than what already exists. Building affordable housing and supporting young families are essential first steps in a much-needed generational reset that puts fairness at the centre of Canadian political life.
Smith School of Business launches new Employee Ownership Research Initiative
Smith School of Business at Queen's University is launching Canada's first-ever research initiative focused on deepening Canada’s knowledge and understanding of a powerful succession model that can enhance outcomes for owners, employees and communities: employee ownership. With funding support from Jon Shell, Chair of Social Capital Partners and a board member at Employee Ownership Canada, the Employee Ownership Research Initiative (EORI) will be housed in Smith’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation & Social Impact (CEISI). The initiative will shape a made-in-Canada approach to employee ownership and create a multi-disciplinary network of academics, researchers, practitioners and businesses to fill gaps in relevant data, expertise and business-oriented resources to support employee-ownership activities across the country.