This post first appeared in Future of Good.
Two new federal bills have received royal assent, making it easier for business owners to create Employee Ownership Trusts and share their wealth with employees.
New incentives will encourage business owners looking to sell to consider an Employee Ownership Trust so employees can have a stake in business ownership.
Selling the company to a trust means employees do not pay out-of-pocket. The loan is paid off from company profits, and employees begin to receive dividends.
Nearly three-quarters of small business owners plan to retire in the next decade.
Advocates have long argued that EOTs have numerous benefits. They allow companies to grow and stay in local communities, contribute to employee retention, and create financial wealth for employees and their families.
Bills C-59 and C-69, which will allow this to happen, received royal assent on June 20.
Bill C-59, a competition bill, means Canadian business owners will qualify for up to $10 million in tax-free capital gains if they sell 51% or more of their company to workers through an EOT.
Bill C-69 is a financial fairness bill which aims to encourage more business owners to sell to an EOT.
“It’s a different wealth-building model, but it lifts everybody and creates good economic opportunities,” Arnold Strub, executive director of Employee Ownership Canada, said earlier this year. “When employees have skin in the game and an ownership mindset, good things start to happen.”
The Government of Canada first read Bill C-59 in the House of Commons, including proposals on Employee Ownership Trusts (EOT), on Nov. 30.
Highlights include extending the capital gains reserve from five to 10 years, a $10-million capital gains exemption, and the ability to use the loan as a tax deduction, all designed to make turning a business into an EOT easier, said Strub.
Broadly, employee ownership meets two crucial goals, said Strub. First, it’s a democratic way for working-class Canadians to acquire wealth.
Such models are also a retention tool, as employees generally have better compensation and develop an ownership mindset.
“There’s a lot of research from the UK and the U.S. that shows that private companies with some type of employee ownership plan do better,” said Strub.
One employee ownership success story can be found in the Canadian prairie town of Altona, Man. where Friesens Corporation has 600 employee-owners in a town of 4,300 people. Established in 1907, the company evolved into four divisions offering trade books, academic annuals, packaging and self-publishing assistance.
In the 1950s, the owners began investigating new ownership models once they knew no next generation would take over. Influenced by the co-operative movement, they started gifting shares to employees who, for a time, could exchange them on a private market. About 30 per cent of the staff owned all of the shares.
That worked until the early aughts when Friesens created an EOT since more people were retiring than purchasing shares.
Now, every employee is an owner, and every employee is a beneficiary.
“Over the last 12 months, we’ve distributed in the neighbourhood of $5.5 million in proceeds to our employee-owners,” CEO Chad Friesen said in January.
“On average, our employee-owners received over $10,000 of what we would call an EOT distribution.
“We feel that our model is the great equalizer in business. It doesn’t matter whether you’ve come from an affluent family down the road or you’re a newcomer who’s arrived here from the Philippines. You both have an equal opportunity within this company to take advantage of ownership benefits.”
The Canadian Employee Ownership Coalition came together 18 months ago to advocate for better incentives to boost employee ownership in Canada.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Trump pumps private equity with 401k changes | Breaking Points podcast
Breaking Points podcast correspondent James Li sits down with corporate lawyer, economic analyst and SCP Fellow Rachel Wasserman to discuss Trump's executive order opening up 401k plans to private equity. Trends show that with rising interest rates and frozen exit markets, the private equity investment model could be under serious stress. So, what are the implications of making this type of investment available to retail investors and their retirement plans? Rachel walks James through how private equity works, what's so dangerous about the buyout-PE model and who might get left holding the bag.
The problem with GDP per capita | West of Centre on CBC
New research by economist and SCP Fellow Gillian Petit estimates what Canada’s GDP per capita would have been over the past decade if Canada had kept our temporary resident numbers stable. On CBC political podcast West of Centre, host Rob Brown asks Petit to dissect the metric politicians love to wield. GDP measures total output, while GDP per capita divides that sum by the population. She explains that the simple math offers an easy snapshot, but can mislead when used alone. For a true read on prosperity, Petit argues Canada needs a broader economic dashboard that weighs productivity, fairness and long term well being.
Blame the denominator, not the economy
Over the last couple of years, there have been countless articles warning of Canada’s poor economic performance. The mic drop has increasingly been Canada’s poor performance relative to peer countries on “GDP per capita,” with growth rankings used to draw a variety of sweeping, negative conclusions about Canada’s economy. SCP CEO Matthew Mendelsohn and Policy Director Dan Skilleter draw on economist and SCP Fellow Dr. Gillian Petit's new research to explain why GDP per capita is a deeply flawed measurement for evaluating rich countries - and is easily influenced by a variety of factors having little to do with economic performance or economic well-being.