This post first appeared in Future of Good.
Two new federal bills have received royal assent, making it easier for business owners to create Employee Ownership Trusts and share their wealth with employees.
New incentives will encourage business owners looking to sell to consider an Employee Ownership Trust so employees can have a stake in business ownership.
Selling the company to a trust means employees do not pay out-of-pocket. The loan is paid off from company profits, and employees begin to receive dividends.
Nearly three-quarters of small business owners plan to retire in the next decade.
Advocates have long argued that EOTs have numerous benefits. They allow companies to grow and stay in local communities, contribute to employee retention, and create financial wealth for employees and their families.
Bills C-59 and C-69, which will allow this to happen, received royal assent on June 20.
Bill C-59, a competition bill, means Canadian business owners will qualify for up to $10 million in tax-free capital gains if they sell 51% or more of their company to workers through an EOT.
Bill C-69 is a financial fairness bill which aims to encourage more business owners to sell to an EOT.
“It’s a different wealth-building model, but it lifts everybody and creates good economic opportunities,” Arnold Strub, executive director of Employee Ownership Canada, said earlier this year. “When employees have skin in the game and an ownership mindset, good things start to happen.”
The Government of Canada first read Bill C-59 in the House of Commons, including proposals on Employee Ownership Trusts (EOT), on Nov. 30.
Highlights include extending the capital gains reserve from five to 10 years, a $10-million capital gains exemption, and the ability to use the loan as a tax deduction, all designed to make turning a business into an EOT easier, said Strub.
Broadly, employee ownership meets two crucial goals, said Strub. First, it’s a democratic way for working-class Canadians to acquire wealth.
Such models are also a retention tool, as employees generally have better compensation and develop an ownership mindset.
“There’s a lot of research from the UK and the U.S. that shows that private companies with some type of employee ownership plan do better,” said Strub.
One employee ownership success story can be found in the Canadian prairie town of Altona, Man. where Friesens Corporation has 600 employee-owners in a town of 4,300 people. Established in 1907, the company evolved into four divisions offering trade books, academic annuals, packaging and self-publishing assistance.
In the 1950s, the owners began investigating new ownership models once they knew no next generation would take over. Influenced by the co-operative movement, they started gifting shares to employees who, for a time, could exchange them on a private market. About 30 per cent of the staff owned all of the shares.
That worked until the early aughts when Friesens created an EOT since more people were retiring than purchasing shares.
Now, every employee is an owner, and every employee is a beneficiary.
“Over the last 12 months, we’ve distributed in the neighbourhood of $5.5 million in proceeds to our employee-owners,” CEO Chad Friesen said in January.
“On average, our employee-owners received over $10,000 of what we would call an EOT distribution.
“We feel that our model is the great equalizer in business. It doesn’t matter whether you’ve come from an affluent family down the road or you’re a newcomer who’s arrived here from the Philippines. You both have an equal opportunity within this company to take advantage of ownership benefits.”
The Canadian Employee Ownership Coalition came together 18 months ago to advocate for better incentives to boost employee ownership in Canada.
Share with a friend
Related reading
New research on the Big Banks and the businesses left behind
The productivity, resilience, inclusive growth and economic sovereignty objectives Canada is trying to achieve are not independent of its financing system. Canada ranks second-worst in the G7 as a place to be an entrepreneur, with 55 per cent of small-business owners saying they would not recommend starting a business here right now. A new SCP report by Michelle Arnold argues that this is not a reflection of the limits of our entrepreneurs, but the limits of our lenders - when it comes to SME financing, what the Big Banks can do is limited by how they're structured. If we want a stronger economy that works for workers, communities and small businesses, we need a financial system diverse enough to serve them.
Built to Exclude: Why Canada’s enterprises need a different kind of financing | Report
Canada's enterprise financing system is dominated by big banks that control 93% of banking assets and nearly 80% of SME lending. While stable and respected, they have structural constraints—minimum deal sizes, rigid credit models, collateral requirements—that systematically stop them from lending to a range of viable businesses. The SMEs left behind include businesses looking for small loans, seasonal enterprises, non-profits, cooperatives and rural firms. If we continue to undercapitalize SMEs trying to get off the ground or grow, this will have cascading economic and social consequences. Canada needs alternative financing institutions that operate alongside commercial banking as permanent, scaled infrastructure.
👏 Letting the big W sink in
In the Spring Economic Update, the federal government moved to make the legislative structure and tax incentive for Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) permanent. This is amazing news! At Social Capital Partners, we are grateful that the government has made these changes. Thanks to Prime Minister Mark Carney, François-Philippe Champagne and Ryan Turnbull for understanding the importance of employee ownership. This and more all in one funny-but-factual biweekly read.