By Dan Skilleter | Part of our Special Series: the Ownership Solution
While it never cracks their Top-10 lists of policy asks, small-business groups and local chambers of commerce have for years been beating the drum of concern over the impending retirement of a massive cohort of baby-boomer business owners. The CFIB’s seminal 2023 report, Succession Tsunami, looms large in the discourse, with its eye-popping statistics of 76% of owners planning to exit over the next decade, with only 10% having a succession plan.
However (with the notable exception of Quebec), it’s a topic that governments across Canada have barely lifted a finger on. Which makes Ontario’s recent public foray into this policy space worth paying attention to.
Last week, Ontario unveiled their plan to implement Budget 2024’s commitment to invest $1.9 million over three years to establish a business succession planning hub. Its newly launched website, SuccessionOntario.ca, helps owners understand their options and funnels them towards a local Small Business Enterprise Centre (SBEC) for tailored advice and services.
They’ve decided to target so-called “micro businesses” and, from what I understand, a lot of the money is going into training and resources for SBEC staff across the province. The average business owner they’re targeting is of a generation that prefers in-person meetings to internet modules—so this approach makes sense.
A couple of interesting things.
First, it was a welcome surprise to see the succession hub’s focus on employee ownership. Featured prominently as the second ‘exit option’ for owners, it’s a strong sign that Canada’s relatively new Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) is breaking through. The EOT is a policy near and dear to my heart, and one I’ve been helping to support the policy design and advocacy of for years. Seeing Ontario recommend it to owners casually alongside options like intergenerational transfer is a sign that it’s becoming mainstream. [1]
Second, the government has adopted an all-too-familiar approach to its problem definition. They view the succession issue as too many business owners without the time, information or know-how to begin their exit planning before it’s too late. Success looks like owners engaging in succession planning early and finding a buyer willing to pay market rate. Any buyer will do.
While important, their framing is single-mindedly focused on the retiring business owner. It overlooks the outcomes for everyone else after the dust has settled. There’s a wide array of buyers out there, each with different implications for the future of the company, its workers and the local community where the company’s located. A foreign private equity firm is a very different new owner than a young entrepreneur, or the employees of the company itself.
The government’s policy lens should be expanded and include a broader commitment to the ongoing resilience, growth and sovereignty of the economy—its slogan is Protect Ontario, after all.
The amount of money Ontario has put into this so far is miniscule, but I take it as a positive signal that succession has finally reached the coveted podium of ‘policy file’ within the bureaucracy.
In 2026, expect Social Capital Partners to spend a lot more of its time working with governments like Ontario on building out the research and ideas to ensure Canada has the right sort of policy infrastructure to withstand the oncoming tsunami.
[1] For those of you who aren’t familiar, the EOT is new federal policy that is tailor-made to help business owners to sell their companies to their employees. For an overview, this is a good start.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Mapping the economic centre-left
The large and well-funded American blogosphere has a pretty wide array of economic voices and ideological camps within the centre-left tent. So big, in fact, that there’s a sub-genre of inter-blog conflict dedicated to people named Matt. Over the years, SCP Director of Policy Dan Skilleter has found it useful to categorize these various different centre-left ideological camps in his head. The categories are not mutually exclusive, and most people probably identify with a few at once. This explainer breaks down each camp's story about what’s wrong with the economy and how they’d prioritize dealing with it.
How intergenerational inequality threatens trust in democracy | Policy Options
Our political leaders must be willing to make difficult tradeoffs to rebalance policies toward the young and away from older Canadians, write Jean-François Daoust, Liam O'Toole and Jacob Robbins-Kanter in Policy Options. The broader economic picture for younger Canadians offers little hope, and economic frustration is shown to run hand-in-hand with political alienation. As intergenerational inequality persists and deepens, Canada risks experiencing an even sharper decline in trust in its democratic institutions than what already exists. Building affordable housing and supporting young families are essential first steps in a much-needed generational reset that puts fairness at the centre of Canadian political life.
Smith School of Business launches new Employee Ownership Research Initiative
Smith School of Business at Queen's University is launching Canada's first-ever research initiative focused on deepening Canada’s knowledge and understanding of a powerful succession model that can enhance outcomes for owners, employees and communities: employee ownership. With funding support from Jon Shell, the EORI will be housed in Smith’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation & Social Impact (CEISI). The initiative will shape a made-in-Canada approach to employee ownership and create a multi-disciplinary network of academics, researchers, practitioners and businesses to fill gaps in relevant data, expertise and business-oriented resources to support employee-ownership activities across the country.