By Dan Skilleter | Part of our Special Series: the Ownership Solution
While it never cracks their Top-10 lists of policy asks, small-business groups and local chambers of commerce have for years been beating the drum of concern over the impending retirement of a massive cohort of baby-boomer business owners. The CFIB’s seminal 2023 report, Succession Tsunami, looms large in the discourse, with its eye-popping statistics of 76% of owners planning to exit over the next decade, with only 10% having a succession plan.
However (with the notable exception of Quebec), it’s a topic that governments across Canada have barely lifted a finger on. Which makes Ontario’s recent public foray into this policy space worth paying attention to.
Last week, Ontario unveiled their plan to implement Budget 2024’s commitment to invest $1.9 million over three years to establish a business succession planning hub. Its newly launched website, SuccessionOntario.ca, helps owners understand their options and funnels them towards a local Small Business Enterprise Centre (SBEC) for tailored advice and services.
They’ve decided to target so-called “micro businesses” and, from what I understand, a lot of the money is going into training and resources for SBEC staff across the province. The average business owner they’re targeting is of a generation that prefers in-person meetings to internet modules—so this approach makes sense.
A couple of interesting things.
First, it was a welcome surprise to see the succession hub’s focus on employee ownership. Featured prominently as the second ‘exit option’ for owners, it’s a strong sign that Canada’s relatively new Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) is breaking through. The EOT is a policy near and dear to my heart, and one I’ve been helping to support the policy design and advocacy of for years. Seeing Ontario recommend it to owners casually alongside options like intergenerational transfer is a sign that it’s becoming mainstream. [1]
Second, the government has adopted an all-too-familiar approach to its problem definition. They view the succession issue as too many business owners without the time, information or know-how to begin their exit planning before it’s too late. Success looks like owners engaging in succession planning early and finding a buyer willing to pay market rate. Any buyer will do.
While important, their framing is single-mindedly focused on the retiring business owner. It overlooks the outcomes for everyone else after the dust has settled. There’s a wide array of buyers out there, each with different implications for the future of the company, its workers and the local community where the company’s located. A foreign private equity firm is a very different new owner than a young entrepreneur, or the employees of the company itself.
The government’s policy lens should be expanded and include a broader commitment to the ongoing resilience, growth and sovereignty of the economy—its slogan is Protect Ontario, after all.
The amount of money Ontario has put into this so far is miniscule, but I take it as a positive signal that succession has finally reached the coveted podium of ‘policy file’ within the bureaucracy.
In 2026, expect Social Capital Partners to spend a lot more of its time working with governments like Ontario on building out the research and ideas to ensure Canada has the right sort of policy infrastructure to withstand the oncoming tsunami.
[1] For those of you who aren’t familiar, the EOT is new federal policy that is tailor-made to help business owners to sell their companies to their employees. For an overview, this is a good start.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Four reasons our economy needs employee ownership now
Employee ownership offers a timely solution to some of Canada’s most pressing economic challenges, writes Deborah Aarts in Smith Business Insight. Evidence shows that when employees share ownership, businesses become more productive, innovative and resilient. Plus, beyond firm-level gains, employee ownership can help address the coming mass retirement of business owners, protect local economic sovereignty, boost national productivity and reduce wealth inequality. There is enough data about the brass-tacks benefits of employee ownership to sway even the most hardened skeptic.
Advice to the public service: Five ways to confront monsters and chaos
Canada's political and bureaucratic leaders are quickly trying to re-wire the federal government to confront a belligerent Unites States, but systems can’t deliver what they were not designed for. This is a time like no other in our history, writes Matthew Mendelsohn, and those making decisions have not been trained for this—because we haven’t experienced anything like this before. Drawing on his own time in Ottawa, he walks us through five priority “machinery of government” changes our public service needs to make to meet the threat of an increasingly authoritarian, imperialist America.
How to get single family homes out of the hands of investors | Toronto Star
About 1.3 million homes in Canada that could be family-owned are held by investors—mostly individuals. In The Star, Matthew Mendelsohn, the Missing Middle Initiative's Mike Moffat and Jon Shell explain how a simple tax change could finance new rental construction while also freeing up homes for families to buy. The policy would temporarily allow investors to defer capital gains taxes if they reinvest proceeds into new purpose-built rentals. Many policy changes are needed to fully address the complex Canadian housing crises, and this could be one that puts Canadian capital to more productive uses.