By SCP Fellow Liliana Locke | Part of our Special Series: Always Canada. Never 51.
The Trump administration’s tariffs and threats are hurting many Canadian businesses. But there is an equally concerning threat closing main street doors and costing jobs: skyrocketing and unregulated commercial rent increases.
Business closures in Ontario increased by almost 10% between January 2023 and January 2024. I interviewed a dozen long-time business owners in Ontario who say they wouldn’t start their businesses here today if given the chance to begin again. These are skilled entrepreneurs, often running family businesses with decades of experience. The problem isn’t their business models or talent—it’s the mounting external pressures that make success so difficult.
While business costs are up across the board, one of the biggest pain points is commercial rent. According to a recent survey by the Better Way Alliance (BWA), a network of Canadian business owners that advocate for fair wages, reasonable work hours and equitable workplace conditions, 75 per cent of businesses that had renewed their commercial leases experienced a rent increase by double or triple digits.
According to the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board, retail rents in Toronto have risen by a whopping 128 per cent since 2020. In cities like Toronto, Vancouver and Waterloo, industrial rents have doubled over the past eight years and, in 2024, approximately half of businesses across Canada reported difficulty coping with rising occupancy costs.
Large commercial real estate landlords, and the global multinationals that can afford their storefront leases, are transforming our neighbourhoods in ways that undermine Canada’s economic resilience and economic sovereignty. We’ve all seen a new condo tower wipe out local shops and replace them with predictable pizza chains and cookie-cutter convenience stores–often owned by global firms or American investors.
When those local independent businesses close, we’re not just losing unique retail shops and services—we’re losing good jobs for local workers, wiping out retirement savings for long-time business owners and making it harder for new entrepreneurs to take the leap.
Contrary to some beliefs, a shortage of commercial real estate is not what’s behind the rising rents.
Often, big landlords have little incentive to negotiate fairly, because they’re willing to forgo rent payments today to hold out for a higher-paying tenant tomorrow—even if it means leaving storefronts vacant. For some commercial real estate investors, leaving the property empty and expecting appreciation in its value is a perfectly reasonable business strategy, even if it is bad for the community.
In Canada, commercial renters don’t have the same legal protections as residential tenants. Policymakers and the public both understand that if a business faces tariffs of 25%, they may not be able to survive. And yet provincial and territorial governments have been unwilling to step in to prohibit commercial rent increases of 25% or far more.
“Policymakers and the public both understand that if a business faces tariffs of 25%, they may not be able to survive. And yet provincial and territorial governments have been unwilling to step in to prohibit commercial rent increases of 25% or far more.”
The exploitation happens because it’s been allowed to happen. Commercial leases are not only not protected by province- or territory-wide rent control caps, but most jurisdictions don’t offer affordable dispute resolution: in Ontario, for instance, commercial landlords can evict a tenant only 16 days after rent is missed, effectively making it impossible to withhold rent if a landlord has failed to cover unexpected repairs or renovations.
There are jurisdictions that have solved for commercial rent hikes that we can learn from in this moment.
France caps commercial rent increases at 10 per cent between lease terms and prohibits tenants from paying for major repairs. Small retail tenants in Australia have access to mediation services for disputes. In New York, tax incentives encourage landlords to lease long-term to local businesses in order to create jobs and California recently adopted progressive legislation that caps rent increases for small brick-and-mortar businesses, while granting tenants additional protections.
In Vancouver, the New Westminster city council passed a motion in 2024 asking the province to explore commercial rent controls to help local businesses and Toronto City Council followed suit shortly after. Toronto voted almost unanimously for a motion that requested the Province of Ontario implement commercial rent reform and other legal protections for commercial tenants—unfortunately, for all its “Canada is not for sale” talk (and hats), the province has not yet moved on these small business protections.
Urgent, actionable changes to provincial and territorial commercial tenancies acts can level the playing field for Canadian small businesses under threat. These include:
Standardized commercial lease agreements, which help both parties understand their responsibilities and obligations.
A dispute resolution system to reduce legal fees and costly court delays.
Legal protection that allows businesses to withhold rent to offset money owed by a landlord—without fear of eviction.
Predictable rent increases through rent caps for commercial leases—similar to those in residential tenancy laws—which would provide business tenants with fair rent changes and the stability they need, while allowing landlords to remain profitable.
With commercial rent control, small businesses could focus on growing and investing in their businesses, rather than grappling with uncertain rent spikes. Especially right now, this kind of growth is crucial in fostering the wellbeing of local economies, protecting and generating Canadian jobs and keeping Canadian businesses locally owned.
A lack of commercial tenancy protections causes undue financial distress and threat of closure. Smart policy in the commercial rent market would provide Canada’s small businesses the vital opportunity to make the investments necessary to overcome this moment.
Canadians are seized with a commitment to buy locally. But many of our policy frameworks are crushing local small businesses, and the only ones that can afford rent are the big global chains. That is not good for the resilience of Canadian businesses or communities. It is also clearly not what Canadians want.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Mapping the economic centre-left
The large and well-funded American blogsphere has a pretty wide array of economic voices and ideological camps within the centre-left tent. So big, in fact, that there’s a sub-genre of inter-blog conflict dedicated to people named Matt. Over the years, SCP Director of Policy Dan Skilleter has found it useful to categorize these various different centre-left ideological camps in his head. The categories are not mutually exclusive, and most people probably identify with a few at once. This explainer breaks down each camp's story about what’s wrong with the economy and how they’d prioritize dealing with it.
How intergenerational inequality threatens trust in democracy | Policy Options
Our political leaders must be willing to make difficult tradeoffs to rebalance policies toward the young and away from older Canadians, write Jean-François Daoust, Liam O'Toole and Jacob Robbins-Kanter in Policy Options. The broader economic picture for younger Canadians offers little hope, and economic frustration is shown to run hand-in-hand with political alienation. As intergenerational inequality persists and deepens, Canada risks experiencing an even sharper decline in trust in its democratic institutions than what already exists. Building affordable housing and supporting young families are essential first steps in a much-needed generational reset that puts fairness at the centre of Canadian political life.
Smith School of Business launches new Employee Ownership Research Initiative
Smith School of Business at Queen's University is launching Canada's first-ever research initiative focused on deepening Canada’s knowledge and understanding of a powerful succession model that can enhance outcomes for owners, employees and communities: employee ownership. With funding support from Jon Shell, Chair of Social Capital Partners and a board member at Employee Ownership Canada, the Employee Ownership Research Initiative (EORI) will be housed in Smith’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation & Social Impact (CEISI). The initiative will shape a made-in-Canada approach to employee ownership and create a multi-disciplinary network of academics, researchers, practitioners and businesses to fill gaps in relevant data, expertise and business-oriented resources to support employee-ownership activities across the country.