Canada’s approach to training and development needs reform. Billions of dollars are spent annually on job training and skills development, with limited evidence of lasting benefits. Most problematic, employers’ talent needs (i.e., actual skills demand) are not formally embedded in the process of determining how or where money is spent, leaving a fundamental disconnect between demand for skills and the investments being made by governments.
“The cost of our system’s supply-demand mismatch is substantial. Provinces are requiring an increasing amount of funding for social assistance programs. These program expenditures are growing at two or three times the rate of economic growth in many provinces. More efficient and demand-driven employment services could lower this return rate and generate significant tax savings for government.”
Share with a friend
Related reading
Watch the video: Why do Canadians work so hard and get so little?
Low productivity means lower wages and a lower standard of living. Canada does need to boost productivity—but we keep trying the wrong things. Watch SCP CEO Matthew Mendelsohn explain the productivity conversation Canada actually needs to have.
Market study submission: Competition in financing for Canada’s SMEs
Small- and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) face significant barriers to accessing capital and we believe that the lack of competition in the banking sector is one of several important contributing factors. We provided comment on the Competition Bureau's upcoming market study on SME financing because we believe that unlocking capital for SMEs and entrepreneurs will strengthen the Canadian economy, bolster our sovereignty and provide more Canadians with pathways to building wealth. We look forward to seeing how the evidence collected will help inform policymakers interested in tackling this issue.
Watch the video: Why would a company sell to its employees?
Canada is facing a $2-trillion business handoff. What if employees owned more of it? In this video, our Director of Policy Dan Skilleter explains why a company would sell to its own employees, how it happens and who stands to benefits. Spoiler alert: employee-owned companies are shown to be 8-12% more productive, share more wealth with their workers, keep businesses Canadian-owned and shore up the resilience of local communities and the broader economy.