The concentration of corporate power in Canada can be traced back to the antiquated objectives of our nation’s competition policy. Our submission to the government’s review of the Competition Act provides sharp critiques and recommendations on a path forward.
We believe that five key economic outcomes can be achieved with the support of robust and active competition policy. This is not a complete list, but offers some of the best examples of how the Act is failing today, and why it is important for this review to be ambitious in its recommendations for a renewed Canadian competition regime. These outcomes are:
- Increased Entrepreneurship and Innovation
- Stronger Small Businesses
- Improved Job Quality
- Resilient Supply Chains
- Lower Prices
Share with a friend
Related reading
Canada needs a new civil defence corps | The Tyee
If Canada were to build a civil defence program on the scale of those in Sweden or Finland, the numbers would be game-changing. As MASS LBP principal Peter MacLeod lays out in The Tyee, Canadians must be prepared to defend our sovereignty and citizens have roles to play.
Four ways to keep Canadian businesses in Canadian hands
Despite the fact that governments, business leaders, workers and Canadians all say they want to be less economically vulnerable, there is a real risk that, two years from now, even more of our businesses and assets will be owned by U.S. investors. SCP's CEO Matthew Mendelsohn and Chair Jon Shell propose four ideas to prevent American finance from gobbling up the Canadian economy.
Trump’s tariff threats expose Canada’s internal monopoly problem | Policy Options
Trump’s tariff threats have opened the door for economic thinking that pushes Canada way past business as usual. In Policy Options, Executive Director of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project Keldon Bester argues that, from airlines to banks, fixing Canada’s competition problem starts with smarter domestic reforms.