There is a growing recognition, both globally and within Canada, that competition is essential to fostering a strong, resilient and productive economy. Yet, despite this consensus, the Canadian economy is becoming increasingly consolidated and entrepreneurship is in steep decline. We are particularly concerned with serial-acquisition strategies wherein large firms acquire smaller companies in ways that evade regulatory scrutiny.
In light of the recent updates to the Competition Act and increased focus on competition as a critical element of a productive economic landscape, we are delighted to have an opportunity to provide input as to how the Competition Bureau might leverage its new powers to limit anti-competitive mergers.
Our recommendations pertain to:
- The content of the revised guidelines
- The internal operational considerations we believe will be critical to maximizing the impact of merger review as a tool
- Increased accessibility of merger review information
Collectively, the recommendations aim to provide a framework for identifying and analyzing concerning below-threshold mergers, ensuring greater transparency and capturing a more fulsome accounting of costs and benefits in merger analysis.
Share with a friend
Related reading
A Conservative case for Community Benefits Agreements?
When a developer builds a new bridge or transit line, a Community Benefits Agreement ensures the project will also benefit the people living nearby. In Canada, CBAs have long been seen as a progressive policy tool. But what if Conservatives embraced them too, just with different priorities? In this piece, SCP's Director of Policy Dan Skilleter explores how Conservative governments might champion their own vision for CBAs and what that means for advocates on the left. The lesson: if you want good social outcomes from big projects, stop letting perfect be the enemy of the good.
Watch the video: EOTs in Canada – a new succession option for business owners with Jon Shell
In this episode of the Moolala: Money Made Simple podcast, Jon Shell joins Bruce Sellery to explain how employee ownership trusts (EOTs) work and why they could reshape business ownership in Canada. They discuss what employee ownership means and how it works, the purpose of the new Employee Ownership Research Initiative, current research gaps around employee-owned businesses and how employee ownership has evolved in Canada in recent years. The conversation explores how employee ownership could support business succession, strengthen workplaces and create new pathways for shared prosperity.
Watch the video: The risks and benefits of opening up private markets to everyday investors
The Ontario Securities Commission wants to give retail investors access to private markets. But as Rachel Wasserman tells BNN Bloomberg, when you look closely, it starts to look less like democratization and more like offloading risk onto people with the least power to absorb it. Private equity is already underperforming S&P index funds over 1, 5 and 10-year periods and PE's biggest historical champions are quietly reducing their exposure. This proposal to offer retail investors access to PE stands to benefit the asset managers and intermediaries, with everyday investors bearing the costs and risks. Financial inclusion does not mean broadening access to financial products that sophisticated players are already walking away from.