There is a growing recognition, both globally and within Canada, that competition is essential to fostering a strong, resilient and productive economy. Yet, despite this consensus, the Canadian economy is becoming increasingly consolidated and entrepreneurship is in steep decline. We are particularly concerned with serial-acquisition strategies wherein large firms acquire smaller companies in ways that evade regulatory scrutiny.
In light of the recent updates to the Competition Act and increased focus on competition as a critical element of a productive economic landscape, we are delighted to have an opportunity to provide input as to how the Competition Bureau might leverage its new powers to limit anti-competitive mergers.
Our recommendations pertain to:
- The content of the revised guidelines
- The internal operational considerations we believe will be critical to maximizing the impact of merger review as a tool
- Increased accessibility of merger review information
Collectively, the recommendations aim to provide a framework for identifying and analyzing concerning below-threshold mergers, ensuring greater transparency and capturing a more fulsome accounting of costs and benefits in merger analysis.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Watch the video: Are foreign takeovers good for Canada’s economy?
We all want more investment in Canada's economy. But as SCP Chair Jon Shell explains in this video, when it comes to foreign investment in the Canadian economy, or FDI, we have to ask: is it investment that builds? Or investment that buys? Because these are two very different things.
Mark Carney’s Davos speech is a manifesto for the world’s middle powers
Mark Carney's recent speech at Davos matters because it treats this moment as a rupture, not a passing disruption. It’s in this rethink, write Matthew Mendelsohn and Jon Shell, that there is also relief: “From the fracture, we can build something better, stronger and more just,” Carney said. “This is the task of the middle powers.” The world's middle powers are not powerless, but we have been acting as if we are, living within the lie of mutual benefit with our outsized and increasingly erratic neighbour. Without the U.S., the world's middle-power democracies are rich, powerful and principled enough that we can unite to advance human well-being, prosperity and progress.
Four reasons our economy needs employee ownership now
Employee ownership offers a timely solution to some of Canada’s most pressing economic challenges, writes Deborah Aarts in Smith Business Insight. Evidence shows that when employees share ownership, businesses become more productive, innovative and resilient. Plus, beyond firm-level gains, employee ownership can help address the coming mass retirement of business owners, protect local economic sovereignty, boost national productivity and reduce wealth inequality. There is enough data about the brass-tacks benefits of employee ownership to sway even the most hardened skeptic.