There is a growing recognition, both globally and within Canada, that competition is essential to fostering a strong, resilient and productive economy. Yet, despite this consensus, the Canadian economy is becoming increasingly consolidated and entrepreneurship is in steep decline. We are particularly concerned with serial-acquisition strategies wherein large firms acquire smaller companies in ways that evade regulatory scrutiny.
In light of the recent updates to the Competition Act and increased focus on competition as a critical element of a productive economic landscape, we are delighted to have an opportunity to provide input as to how the Competition Bureau might leverage its new powers to limit anti-competitive mergers.
Our recommendations pertain to:
- The content of the revised guidelines
- The internal operational considerations we believe will be critical to maximizing the impact of merger review as a tool
- Increased accessibility of merger review information
Collectively, the recommendations aim to provide a framework for identifying and analyzing concerning below-threshold mergers, ensuring greater transparency and capturing a more fulsome accounting of costs and benefits in merger analysis.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Mapping the economic centre-left
The large and well-funded American blogsphere has a pretty wide array of economic voices and ideological camps within the centre-left tent. So big, in fact, that there’s a sub-genre of inter-blog conflict dedicated to people named Matt. Over the years, SCP Director of Policy Dan Skilleter has found it useful to categorize these various different centre-left ideological camps in his head. The categories are not mutually exclusive, and most people probably identify with a few at once. This explainer breaks down each camp's story about what’s wrong with the economy and how they’d prioritize dealing with it.
How intergenerational inequality threatens trust in democracy | Policy Options
Our political leaders must be willing to make difficult tradeoffs to rebalance policies toward the young and away from older Canadians, write Jean-François Daoust, Liam O'Toole and Jacob Robbins-Kanter in Policy Options. The broader economic picture for younger Canadians offers little hope, and economic frustration is shown to run hand-in-hand with political alienation. As intergenerational inequality persists and deepens, Canada risks experiencing an even sharper decline in trust in its democratic institutions than what already exists. Building affordable housing and supporting young families are essential first steps in a much-needed generational reset that puts fairness at the centre of Canadian political life.
Smith School of Business launches new Employee Ownership Research Initiative
Smith School of Business at Queen's University is launching Canada's first-ever research initiative focused on deepening Canada’s knowledge and understanding of a powerful succession model that can enhance outcomes for owners, employees and communities: employee ownership. With funding support from Jon Shell, Chair of Social Capital Partners and a board member at Employee Ownership Canada, the Employee Ownership Research Initiative (EORI) will be housed in Smith’s Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation & Social Impact (CEISI). The initiative will shape a made-in-Canada approach to employee ownership and create a multi-disciplinary network of academics, researchers, practitioners and businesses to fill gaps in relevant data, expertise and business-oriented resources to support employee-ownership activities across the country.