There is a growing recognition, both globally and within Canada, that competition is essential to fostering a strong, resilient and productive economy. Yet, despite this consensus, the Canadian economy is becoming increasingly consolidated and entrepreneurship is in steep decline. We are particularly concerned with serial-acquisition strategies wherein large firms acquire smaller companies in ways that evade regulatory scrutiny.
In light of the recent updates to the Competition Act and increased focus on competition as a critical element of a productive economic landscape, we are delighted to have an opportunity to provide input as to how the Competition Bureau might leverage its new powers to limit anti-competitive mergers.
Our recommendations pertain to:
- The content of the revised guidelines
- The internal operational considerations we believe will be critical to maximizing the impact of merger review as a tool
- Increased accessibility of merger review information
Collectively, the recommendations aim to provide a framework for identifying and analyzing concerning below-threshold mergers, ensuring greater transparency and capturing a more fulsome accounting of costs and benefits in merger analysis.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Watch the video: Should pension funds help build Canada’s future? | TVO’s The Rundown
TVO's The Rundown convened a discussion about whether Canadian pension funds should increase domestic investments versus investing internationally. The video segment examines the risks and rewards of using Canadian pension capital for nation-building projects, highlighting that Canadian pension funds managed nearly $2.5 trillion in assets by the end of 2024, but a large portion is invested outside of Canada. Panelists Matthew Mendelsohn and Keith Ambachtsheer discuss whether funds should focus solely on financial returns or also on contributing to Canada's economic growth.
Tied Up: Unleashing Canada’s non-profit housing potential
Canada’s non-profit housing sector is structurally constrained. Well-intentioned accountability mechanisms, designed to protect public investment and ensure affordability, often have the unintended effect of limiting balance-sheet capacity, restricting access to financing and preventing asset leverage. Consequently, the non-market housing sector remains underdeveloped. In consultation with stakeholders and partners in the non-profit housing space, report authors Michelle Arnold and Savraj Syan identify three technical issue fixes that could unleash Canada's non-profit housing potential.
Unlocking non-profit assets: The low-cost fixes Canada’s housing sector desperately needs
Growing the non-market housing sector is a national priority and building the capacity of non-profits to deliver more of it is one of the most important levers available. Unfortunately, explain Michelle Arnold and Savraj Syan, at the very moment governments are counting on non-profit housing providers to deliver more affordable housing, a set of overlooked technical barriers is preventing those same providers from leveraging their own assets—which is key to increasing their borrowing power—to do exactly that.