There is a growing recognition, both globally and within Canada, that competition is essential to fostering a strong, resilient and productive economy. Yet, despite this consensus, the Canadian economy is becoming increasingly consolidated and entrepreneurship is in steep decline. We are particularly concerned with serial-acquisition strategies wherein large firms acquire smaller companies in ways that evade regulatory scrutiny.
In light of the recent updates to the Competition Act and increased focus on competition as a critical element of a productive economic landscape, we are delighted to have an opportunity to provide input as to how the Competition Bureau might leverage its new powers to limit anti-competitive mergers.
Our recommendations pertain to:
- The content of the revised guidelines
- The internal operational considerations we believe will be critical to maximizing the impact of merger review as a tool
- Increased accessibility of merger review information
Collectively, the recommendations aim to provide a framework for identifying and analyzing concerning below-threshold mergers, ensuring greater transparency and capturing a more fulsome accounting of costs and benefits in merger analysis.
Share with a friend
Related reading
Market study submission: Competition in financing for Canada’s SMEs
Small- and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) face significant barriers to accessing capital and we believe that the lack of competition in the banking sector is one of several important contributing factors. We provided comment on the Competition Bureau's upcoming market study on SME financing because we believe that unlocking capital for SMEs and entrepreneurs will strengthen the Canadian economy, bolster our sovereignty and provide more Canadians with pathways to building wealth. We look forward to seeing how the evidence collected will help inform policymakers interested in tackling this issue.
Watch the video: Why would a company sell to its employees?
Canada is facing a $2-trillion business handoff. What if employees owned more of it? In this video, our Director of Policy Dan Skilleter explains why a company would sell to its own employees, how it happens and who stands to benefits. Spoiler alert: employee-owned companies are shown to be 8-12% more productive, share more wealth with their workers, keep businesses Canadian-owned and shore up the resilience of local communities and the broader economy.
How Canada can curb the serial acquisitions quietly reshaping our economy
In many cases, threats to the affordability of everyday goods and services are the byproduct of what competition experts call serial acquisitions—a pattern of larger firms buying up a series of smaller players to try and corner the market. As Michelle Arnold and Kiran Gill explain, a fair and competitive economy does not emerge by accident. The Competition Bureau's proposed Merger Enforcement Guidelines will play an important role in preventing bigger firms from creating unfair playing fields that hurt Canadian small businesses, workers and consumers. The next step for the bureau should be aggressive enforcement of the new guidelines.